A fellow Lawrencian Ron Pine sent me an article he wrote for CSICOP in which he argues that Intelligent Design does not even qualify as pseudoscience because it is void of any content. I am not sure about this. I am not sure what content astrology for instance has or crop circle science either, but I do see ID as a fraud and a scam...mmm maybe that is a bit redundant. Let's just say fraud or scam. Check his article out for yourself at http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/pine.html.
Oh check out CSICOP,
Another CSICOP ID critique is, Very Like a Machine by Robert Camp.