A fellow Lawrencian Ron Pine sent me an article he wrote for
CSICOP in which he argues that Intelligent Design does not even qualify as pseudoscience because it is void of any content. I am not sure about this. I am not sure what content astrology for instance has or crop circle science either, but I do see ID as a fraud and a scam...mmm maybe that is a bit redundant. Let's just say fraud or scam. Check his article out for yourself at
http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/pine.html.Oh check out CSICOP,
Probably the religious right feels the same way about CSICOP as they feel about the
ACLU. :-)
Another CSICOP ID critique is,
Very Like a Machine by
Robert Camp.
No comments:
Post a Comment